|
Description
|
1. General This folder contains the main datasets generated during the development of the doctoral thesis, including results from wind vs. seismic action comparisons, seismic fragility functions, and probabilistic structural collapse risk assessments. 2. File Description 2.1 Wind vs Seismic Analysis df_wind_vs_seismic.csv Dataset containing the results of the comparative analysis between wind and seismic actions for 127,600 structural models distributed across Brazil. These results are presented and discussed in Chapter 4 of the thesis. 2.2 Seismic Fragility Functions FF_TipX_YPav.csv Set of files containing the results of seismic fragility functions developed for different structural scenarios. Naming convention: X → Structural typology (1, 2, 3, 4, or 5) Y → Number of stories (3, 6, 9, or 12) Example: FF_Tip3_9Pav.csv → Typology 3 with 9 stories These files provide fragility parameters associated with different seismic design levels, represented by the seismic response coefficient Cs. The corresponding results are presented and discussed in Chapter 5 of the thesis. 2.3 Seismic Risk Analysis pf_riskanalysis.csv Dataset containing the results of seismic risk analysis, expressed in terms of annual probability of structural collapse. The analysis considers structures located in the Northeast region of Brazil and is based on the integration of fragility functions with seismic hazard curves. These results are presented and discussed in Chapter 5 of the thesis. 3. Data Structure In general, the .csv files follow a tabular structure where: Each row represents a structural scenario or a specific parameter combination; Each column corresponds to an input variable, intermediate parameter, or analysis result. Typical variables may include: Structural geometric parameters; Material properties; Seismic intensity measures (e.g., Sa); Seismic response coefficient (Cs); Fragility parameters (θ, β); Annual probability of collapse (pf). 4. Important Notes The results were obtained from numerical models developed in OpenSees, with structural design based on Brazilian standards. Fragility functions follow a lognormal distribution. Risk analysis was performed through integration with seismic hazard curves. It is recommended to consult the thesis for proper interpretation of the data. (2026-04-23)
|